Category Archives: Operating Model

Do you feel the urge (to innovate)?

The call to innovate has never been stronger given the current market challenges. The dilemma faced by many organizations is that reality is never simple and often there is a significant mindset block in tackling how innovation requires a change in Operating Model.

The fear of failure, loss of influence or power, lack of control and inability to trust in a guaranteed outcome block changes. How do organizations navigate this?

To truly leverage innovation, you need a plan:

“If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail

Benjamin Franklin

Information + No Insight = No Strategy

No strategy? Leaders need to step up to the call to action and develop a plan to utilize innovation. This plan must address people, process and technology. Hoping technology adoption will happen just through training is over simplistic – what does it mean for the user experience? The innovation needs to deliver a well thought out advantage and resolve the WIIFME (What’s In It For Me) ‘balancing act’ across the end-to-end process. Innovation for innovation sake is not a plan. The strategy needs to be clear, insightful and deliver value.

Investment, leadership sponsorship, ‘A’ team formation are of course the usual prerequisites.

Still keen to to innovate? Establish a super user audience to ensure your strategy is smart. Even the best innovation can result in a ‘hot mess’ which will be considered as a ‘great idea, just badly executed’ if there is no clear understanding of the outcome benefits and process to capture value.

Know your audience! Transform the mindset.

This is Cognitive.

Buying, Purchasing and Procurement – What’s the value difference?

For those working in the supply side profession, the perceived performance difference between these roles can be enormous. Is this because we are fixated by titles and getting recognized? Probably.

Titles aside, the challenge within any organization is articulating your value add. Where organizations are inclusive, and there is an understood benefit for a particular role, titles become less important. The team normalizes effort and then starts to synergize performance.

In those organizations where the functions are less mature, and or management is less experienced with best practices, there is a need to establish and build a function brand / reputation to underscore your targeted value add. There is a broad spectrum of skill set expertise / emphasis which requires us to position and differentiate roles. To confuse further, organizational roles titles may be interchanged which blurs the understanding around the role deliverable emphasis.

Key supply side function roles

Buyer: This role traditionally supports and generates the PR/PO transaction. This administrative role is important but tends to be overshadowed by the more strategic elements involved in supplier selection, negotiation, contracting and management (buying process). Check out a couple of Buyer job descriptions. Getting a super star that delivers the strategic elements as well as attending to the administration detail is rare. Individuals tend to have either strategic or transaction skill biases.

Purchasing: This role incorporates the strategic elements of the buying process, however there is more emphasis on compliance and governance activities. A common complaint about the purchasing process is that it seems to be arranged to hinder business, is risk adverse, and too focused on price rather cost. Together with a tendency to be reactive, ticking boxes rather than adding value can be an easy trap for less developed purchasing functions.

Procurement: This role includes all of the purchasing elements, and is typically targeted to add value and improve total cost of ownership. Procurement is much more strategic than Purchasing, and better aligned to organizational goals. Moving from a reactive to proactive approach is a key enabler for the function to deliver value. There is a much more emphasis on relationships. The downside is that the long game requires more effort and time investment. The upside is that business benefits are much greater (see my article x10 Impact).

The supply side source, contract, purchase and pay cycle is common throughout all the roles; but depending on how you position the function, the emphasis changes. For those within the supply side function, procurement positioning is generally preferred because of its strategic nature. This is not to suggest that the emphasis associated with the other roles is less important. Many larger organizations separate out the roles within the overall function to help manage the different elements of the value chain. Super stars are difficult to find, and harder to scale when you expand the function.

Positively, a recent survey suggests that 85% of respondents position the function as strategic. This is great news, however a more in depth survey is required to better explore the organizations understanding and valuation of their supply side function.

LinkedIn Survey screenshot

Operating Model

An operating model is the way an organization does its work, and considers the structure, roles and collection of processes it uses to perform the work. Depending on the supply side function capability and aspiration to build its brand/reputation, an appropriate operating model needs to be developed. Starting with the basic role building blocks and moving up the value stack is a journey and a valid strategy. Note: matching capabilities with the operating model is a continual balancing act. Change management is required.

For those organizations with the supply side function already positioned at the strategic procurement level, I wonder if the operating model is truly aligned with the targeted brand/reputation – Is it where you want it to be? We know there is always room for improvement and alternative ideas and strategies exist.

To conclude, titles and positioning statements are a matter of matching and marketing the function. The reality is that customers value what they value! The real test is whether you have the capability to deliver that value.

What’s your value add? Have thoughts. Please share. Contact Us.

The Danger of back office Digital Transformation without Balance

With all new technologies, there is a danger that they get misapplied. misused and abused. Given the drive to digitalize the back office and deliver ROI, there can be a lack of consideration and practical understanding on how policies, people and processes are optimized.

Finance and Procurement functions measure spend managed by the team, encouraged by compliance and governance committees, to steer towards a ‘one size fits all’ approach in how the technology platform is configured. This usually leads to an overstretch of available resources, creation of process bottlenecks and a failure by finance and procurement to service the business adequately. The result is seen as an over promise and under deliver, and the technology is blamed.

This is not a technology problem, rather reflects the challenge of how the technology was implemented. Organizations must spend time to get into the detail on how the stakeholders buy; seeking to differentiate and simplify the different sourcing channels that can become configured correctly in the technology platform, and supplemented as appropriate, with complementary solutions. The output defines the new target operating model, matched with organization’s capability, to deliver value add across the end-to-end process without hampering one function over the other.

Together with investment in change management and all that it entails, digital transformation becomes a journey that starts with this first purposeful step.

Need Help. Contact Us.

Procurement Leadership Competencies

In this age of supply chain disruption and market shocks, what are the key attributes Procurement need to navigate these challenging times to sustain value:

  1. Understand the business and supply market
    • Without the fundamentals of understanding your business needs, Procurement cannot align its supply side strategy to support business success
    • Finding and matching the right strategy to those business goals requires procurement leaders to act and think like business managers
  2. Transformational leadership
    • Transformation and change management requires procurement leadership to have a clear vision with benefits that can be articulated appropriately across the different stakeholder groups. Communication skills are critical.
    • Walk the talk, leading by example, helps build trust with stakeholders
  3. Know the Technology
    • Technology is only an enabler – it is only one element of the success equation
    • Map and apply the right Technology based on the maturity of the function and organization
  4. Transition the Operating Model
    • Change the model – insanity is doing the same thing again and again, yet expecting different results #
    • Take small bite steps that support incremental improvements in a steady direction
    • “Sell success based on success”
  5. Collaborate with Partners to Innovate
    • External supply side resources are typically the largest single resource pool available to the organization – involve your partners in your business challenges
    • Share benefits to encourage win/win
  6. Operate flexibly and transparently
    • Open your mind to alternative approaches
    • Challenge and change to seek better ways

Food for thought. Need help. Contact Us.